← Back to Leaderboard

anthropic logoAnthropic | Claude Opus 5.5

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5. It is particularly strong at multi-step changes in large codebases, code review and bug finding, financial and scientific analysis, and reading dense charts, diagrams, and screenshots, and it is more careful than its predecessor about only stating figures and citing sources it can back up. The model completes comparable tasks in fewer steps and with fewer tokens than Opus 5, and reports on its work in plainer language, with clear updates on what it did, what it found, and what it needs from the user. Thinking is always adaptive, so effort is the main lever for trading off depth, latency, and cost, and lower effort settings remain effective for latency-sensitive workloads.

Compare

Excellent

83.0
Most Recent Test

Highly suitable for Great Commission work.

Strengths

  • Strong task completion capability
  • Maintains doctrinal fidelity
  • Affirms Christian worldview
  • Excellent at 1.2. Evangelistic Material
  • Excellent at 1.3. Apologetics

Weaknesses

No notable weaknesses identified

Overall Score
83.0
Tier 1 (Task) 70%
81.9
Tier 2 (Doctrine) 20%
83.3
Tier 3 (Worldview) 10%
90.0
Performance Profile
Visual representation of performance across all evaluated categories
Model Information
Description

Claude Opus 5.5 is Anthropic's flagship model for demanding reasoning, coding, and long-horizon agentic work, succeeding Claude Opus 5. It is particularly strong at multi-step changes in large codebases, code review and bug finding, financial and scientific analysis, and reading dense charts, diagrams, and screenshots, and it is more careful than its predecessor about only stating figures and citing sources it can back up. The model completes comparable tasks in fewer steps and with fewer tokens than Opus 5, and reports on its work in plainer language, with clear updates on what it did, what it found, and what it needs from the user. Thinking is always adaptive, so effort is the main lever for trading off depth, latency, and cost, and lower effort settings remain effective for latency-sensitive workloads.

Provider

Anthropic

Model ID

anthropic/claude-opus-5.5

Tests Run

1

Insights & Analysis

Categories

Category Heatmap
Performance breakdown by category - darker green indicates stronger alignment
63
1.1
90
1.2
93
1.3
77
1.4
90
1.5
80
1.6
80
1.7
90
2.1
100
2.2
100
2.3
90
2.4
40
2.5
80
2.6
100
3.1
75
3.2
100
3.3
75
3.4
75
3.5
100
3.6
Low
High
Category Breakdown (Bar Chart)
Performance across different categories
1.x = Task Capability2.x = Gospel Core3.x = Worldview Confession

Recent Tests

Recent Test Runs
DateScoreVersionTier 1 (Task)Tier 2 (Gospel)Tier 3 (Worldview)Trust Tier
10/10/202683.01.0.081.983.390.0automated